Computer Forensics LLC of Florida Contact

Our computer forensics and e-discovery expert witnesses are ready to assist you with all of your computer forensics, cell phone forensics, and e-discovery needs. Our complete contact information is listed below.

Locate our Subject Matter Experts in FindLaw’s Case Law section
U.S. v. MORTON - U.S. v. SCHALES
Find our Computer Forensics Expert Witnesses on Google or Bing

Contact Us by Email:

IN ORDER TO HELP REDUCE SPAM TO VIEW THIS EMAIL ADDRESS REQUIRES THAT JAVASCRIPT BE ENABLED
We do respond to emails daily (usually within a few hours)

Contact Us by Phone:

561.404.3074

Office Address:

Computer Forensics LLC
1880 North Congress Ave. Suite 333
Boynton Beach, Florida 33426

Mailing Address:

Computer Forensics LLC
4371 Northlake Blvd #314
Palm Beach, Florida 33410

For most engagements, available travel fee free in West Palm Beach, Miami-Dade, Fort Lauderdale-Broward, Stuart-Martin, Port Saint Lucie, Fort Pierce, Treasure Coast, and Vero Beach-Indian River Florida

Only 1 Hour travel to Orlando-Orange County, Daytona Beach-Volusia, Cocoa Beach-Palm Bay-Titusville-Melbourne-Brevard, and Kissimmee-Saint Cloud Florida

Computer Forensics LLC Expert Dave Kleiman's Published Works

Links

See our Subject Matter Experts national news television appearances NEWS

Locate our Computer Forensic Expert Witnesses in FindLaw's Case Law section
U.S. v. MORTON - U.S. v. SCHALES

Download Computer Forensics LLC's Training Files

Cybercrime Review


7th Circuit dismisses CFAA civil claim for failure to satisfy $5,000 loss requirement This case focuses a bit more on the civil side of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). In Modrowski v. Pogatto, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals demonstrates the importance of the value requirement of a civil suit under the CFAA. 18 U.S.C. Â§ 1030(g) states, in relevant part, that [a]ny person who suffers damage or loss by reason of a violation of this section may maintain a civil acti DOJ obtained Associated Press phone records; AP demands return and destruction of data The Associated Press announced today that the Justice Department obtained two months of telephone records from more than twenty AP office telephones just over a year ago. The DOJ notified the AP of the investigation on Friday. AP's President and CEO has "demanded the return of the phone records and destruction of all copies." According to the AP, the process for obtaining records from n Former Romney/Ryan intern charged with cyberstalking and internet extortion denied bail In United States v. Savader, 13-MJ-359 (E.D.N.Y. May 7, 2013), Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown denied bail to Adam Savader because of the nature of his crimes (cyberstalking and internet extortion) and due to the "weaponized" nature of the cache of compromising pictures the defendant possesses. The court's reference to weaponization derived from the fact that the images of the 15 victims were in c NSA releases 642-page Internet research guide The National Security Agency recently released a 642-page guide titled "Untangling The Web: A Guide To Internet Research" under a Freedom of Information Act request. As the major purpose of the guide is to "help you understand how to use the Internet more efficiently," there isn't much in the document worth noting - perhaps made clear by the fact that the 642 pages are almost entirely unredacted Breaking: Fed. judge denies motions to suppress in Rigmaiden; 4th Amendment, SCA case with Stingray use by FBI (Updated) In United States v. Rigmaiden, No. 2:08-cr-00814-DGC (D. Ariz. May 8, 2013), a federal district judge in Arizona denied all of the defendant's motions to suppress. The motions were related to searches, the FBI's use of Stingray, access to stored communications and IP addresses, etc. It is long, but worth the read. An excerpt (relating to the Fourth Amendment argument): Given the unique circ Featured Paper: Jonesing for a Privacy Mandate, Getting a Technology Fix--Doctrine to Follow Stephanie K. Pell has posted a new paper on SSRN entitled: "Jonesing for a Privacy Mandate, Getting a Technology Fix--Doctrine to Follow." Hat-tip to Chris Soghoian for mentioning it on Twitter. The article abstract is below: While the Jones Court held unanimously that the governmentâ€™s use of a GPS device to track Antoine Jonesâ€™ vehicle for 28 days was a Fourth Amendment search, the Just "Revenge porn" website owner offers to close site if he raises $200,000 There was a time when people ended a relationship and moved on with their lives. Nowadays, with digital cameras and the Internet, it is much easier to seek revenge for all of the wrongs you experienced. For those of you unaware, "revenge porn" is the term applied when a person posts nude images of someone they know on the Internet - often doing so after the end of a relationship. Several r Defendant argues WI child porn law unconstitutional; if you're texted CP and open it, are you guilty of possessing CP? Could someone texting you child porn, a text you unwittingly open, get you charged with a felony? Also, is it fair to charge adult males with child porn possession but not the underage females that texted the images to them, if they both technically possess child pornography? The case below raises both issues. In State v. Perino, No.'s 2012-CF-0217, 2012-CM-0116 (Wis. Cir. Ct. filed Jan. 18 & Part 1 (The Facts): CFAA case to test the EFF's proposed reform language In this first post I will outline the relevant facts of the Fidlar case and how the facts present an interesting issue for the proposed CFAA reform language of the EFF (and Rep. Lofgren). At the end of this post, I note EFF Attorney Hanni Fakhoury's initial take on the case. In the second post I will offer my own take. I will then propose some changes to the reform language that wou